Memuat isi artikel…
Pengembangan Produk Multi-Item untuk Model Inventaris EOQ dengan Kualitas Barang Tidak Sempurna
Memuat…
Abstract
The competitive business environment encourages manufacturing companies to produce high-quality goods. However, companies often receive raw materials that do not meet production standards. These imperfect raw materials are caused by various factors such as improper shipping processes, damage, human error, and soon. This leads to a shortage of raw materials during the production process, necessitating reordering to meet production needs. The objective of this research is to develop a formulation model to determine the optimal ordering time intervals, order lot sizes, and total profit when a company has more than one raw material from a single supplier while considering the presence of defective goods. The research processes data by deriving the EOQ formula from a previous study model on single-item inventory policy with defective products, extending it to a multi-item inventory policy with defective products. The results show that the multi-item model generates 1.5 times higher total profit compared to the single-item model ($51,307 vs. $34,064 per unit per year). In addition, the ordering interval for the multi-item model is 52.1 days longer compared to the single-item model, which only has a 10-day interval. Finally, the multi-item model involves larger order lot sizes. Ordering raw materials simultaneously reduces ordering and holding costs, making the multi-item model more efficient and yielding higher profits than the single-item model.
Keywords
EOQ; Single Item; Multi-Item; Total Profit; Waktu Interval Pemesanan; Ukuran Lot Pemesanan
Research Intelligence
Data from OpenAlex ↗
Metrics
Topics
Semantic Profile AI-classified research signals
Core Domains
Secondary Topics
Institution Network
-
Bandung Institute of Technology
Fariz Harahap · Dwitra Harkinata · Melviani Karolin Kamaralo · Yosi Agustina Hidayat
References
- 1. Eroglu, A., & Ozdemir, G. (2007). An economic order quantity model with defective items and shortages.
- International Journal of Production Economics, 106(2), 544–549.
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.06.015 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.06.015
- 2. Maddah, B., & Jaber, M. Y. (2008a). Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited.
- International Journal of Production Economics, 112(2), 808–815.
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.07.003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.07.003
- 3. Maddah, B., & Jaber, M. Y. (2008b). Economic order quantity for items with imperfect quality: Revisited.
- International Journal of Production Economics, 112(2), 808–815.
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.07.003 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.07.003
- 4. Nobil, A. H., Sedigh, A. H. A., & Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2020). Reorder point for the EOQ inventory
- model with imperfect quality items. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(4), 1339–1343.
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.03.004 DOI: 10.1016/j.asej.2020.03.004
- 5. Roy, M. Das, Sana, S. S., & Chaudhuri, K. (2011). An economic order quantity model of imperfect quality
- items with partial backlogging. International Journal of Systems Science, 42(8), 1409–1419.
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00207720903576498 DOI: 10.1080/00207720903576498
- 6. Salameh, M. K., & Jaber, M. Y. (2000). Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect
- quality. International Journal of Production Economics, 64(1–3), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925 DOI: 10.1016/s0925
- 5273(99)00044-4
- 7. Wahab, M. I. M., & Jaber, M. Y. (2010). Economic order quantity model for items with imperfect quality,
- different holding costs, and learning effects: A note. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(1), 186–190.
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2009.07.007 DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2009.07.007